Lawmakers Fight Indiana Gaming Commission Over Financial Disclosures

A group of lawmakers in Indiana is seeking to repeal a new rule implemented by the Indiana Gaming Commission (IGC).

The rule was established by the IGC to prevent financial scandals in the state’s gaming industry. However, this assembly of representatives thinks it infringes on privacy rights.

Legislators battle against Indiana Gaming Commission regulation

What exactly is this rule, and why do certain legislators take issue with it?

The regulation was a reaction to the scandal involving Spectacle Entertainment.

The commission discovered connections between Spectacle executives and a political money-laundering scheme.

This resulted in the IGC asking all Indiana casino owners to reveal detailed financial background information.

It hoped that these disclosures would assist in preventing similar corruption cases in the future.

The rule implemented by the IGC led to some issues, as a few casino owners were reluctant to reveal their financial status.

This specifically caused problems for the state’s Hard Rock casinos. Both establishments had minority owners who were not adhering to the rule.

At its recent meeting, the IGC managed to resolve some of those problems, however, lawmakers continue to question the existence of the rule.

The seven lawmakers who are objecting to the rule include:

  • Bob Heaton (R-Terre Haute)
  • Terri Austin (D-Anderson)
  • Beau Baird (R-Greencastle)
  • Steve Bartels (R-Eckerty)
  • Michelle Davis (R-Whiteland)
  • Jeff Ellington (R-Bloomington)
  • Alan Morrison (R-Brazil)

The group voiced various complaints to the IGC through a letter.

The argument is that the IGC’s rule should have undergone “significantly more vetting and scrutiny” before it was established as an official policy.

The lawmakers also express worry that the possible advantages of the rule may not justify the difficulties it has caused in the industry to date.

We kindly request that you reassess the potential benefits of determining if a minority stakeholder owns 10 Apple shares, in contrast to the impact of delaying or forbidding any part of the Gary casino project or the construction of the Terre Haute gaming facility. Please consider the possible economic effects on both of these financially struggling communities.

If things continue at this pace, the group’s problems with the rule will begin to extend into 2022.

Indiana online casinos could be complicated by IGC rule

The fallout from the Spectacle is now officially posing a threat to other sectors of Indiana’s gambling industry.

Firstly, a group of casino owners has already attempted to sue the IGC to eliminate the rule.

The judge ruled in favor of the commission, affirming that the IGC had full authority to establish and implement the rule.

The court’s decision would have to be overturned by the lawmakers attempting to block the rule.

Overcoming the judge’s ruling is one thing, but completely revising the rule is another.

The legislators are warning that they may raise the issue of the rule during the General Assembly in 2022.

Should that occur, the launch of online casinos in Indiana may be postponed even more.

Ideally, Indiana would have legalized online casinos during the 2021 session. However, it fell short of this goal.

Legislative sessions in Indiana have limited time, with only a small portion dedicated to issues related to gambling.

Should the group of lawmakers excessively focus on the IGC rule, they could potentially divert the legislative attention away from online casinos. This could create an additional obstacle in the pursuit of legalization.

Fortunately, there is ample time before this begins to turn into a genuine issue.

So far, the IGC has remained firm in its decision and is likely to maintain this stance in the future.

Nonetheless, the commission may choose to make adjustments to prevent future obstacles in the industry.

Currently, both parties are at a deadlock. The rule will persist in its present state until the IGC takes action.

If neither side is willing to compromise, 2022 might be a letdown for Indiana residents who are eager to see online casinos in their state.

Photo by Dreamstime
Jake Garza Avatar
Written by
Jake Garza

Jake Garza is a Gambling Industry Analyst for Catena Media in the United States. His expertise lies in the arena of Midwest sports betting and casino content. Before delving into the legal gambling industry, Garza worked as a professional sports writer, covering teams such as the Cincinnati Bengals, Indianapolis Colts, and Indiana Pacers. Presently, he is the Managing Editor for Play Indiana and PlayOhio, having previously worked with other renowned brands like PlayIllinois and PlayMichigan. Since 2019, Garza has been reporting on the gambling industry and is part of a team of journalists that delivers extensive coverage of the legal U.S. gambling industry.

View all posts by Jake Garza